Congrats on the human writing. I just copied and pasted my last 10 articles in to a new post as I was intrigued. 8 Human, 1 Assisted AI and 100% AI generated.
@Richard Wheadon that’s interesting! And were they false flags on the two? Or were you just efficient and eloquent enough to make it think you were a machine?
Ha, i’m trying to work out why it flagged one as AI, i think it might because I love to use personal stories and on one piece i didn’t have any. Also i just went to repost my fav old article flagged as 100% human to show that i write myself, and i added a link to my book to the bottom of the page (always selling) and rechecked the Pangram check before posting lucky i did as it suddenly came back as 20% AI only difference was the link to my book.
We’ve been chatting about what the numbers even mean because it’s unclear through Pangram whether it’s 20% construction by AI or if it’s a 20% chance of AI use
No idea, but adding a link to my book making it 20% AI anything is not good. This could cause lots of writers to grt very frustrated with false positives they wont want to publish their work.
So i tested it out today before posting. Made a couple of tweaks and got it to shift to 20% AI. I did it by changing the paragraph structure to several stand out single sentences. Same words different structure.
Im thinking of copying 3 articles into 1 post. 1 of my several identified as 100% human, the 1 identified as. 100% AI and the one that is 50/50 and let people come to their own conclusion. But dont want a pile on where people claim im lying about the AI written one and give some reason why its not me
Congrats on the human writing. I just copied and pasted my last 10 articles in to a new post as I was intrigued. 8 Human, 1 Assisted AI and 100% AI generated.
@Richard Wheadon that’s interesting! And were they false flags on the two? Or were you just efficient and eloquent enough to make it think you were a machine?
Ha, i’m trying to work out why it flagged one as AI, i think it might because I love to use personal stories and on one piece i didn’t have any. Also i just went to repost my fav old article flagged as 100% human to show that i write myself, and i added a link to my book to the bottom of the page (always selling) and rechecked the Pangram check before posting lucky i did as it suddenly came back as 20% AI only difference was the link to my book.
We’ve been chatting about what the numbers even mean because it’s unclear through Pangram whether it’s 20% construction by AI or if it’s a 20% chance of AI use
People are so not ready for the conversation on unscored pathways...
One of my planned work tasks when term 4 calms down is a list of “everything wrong or inefficient” both from vcaa and my school individually.
I was just talking with Rach at dinner about unscored and she said “so they essentially get a certificate just attending”
No idea, but adding a link to my book making it 20% AI anything is not good. This could cause lots of writers to grt very frustrated with false positives they wont want to publish their work.
It would be an interesting experiment to write a post that triggers as much of what it scans for as you can through various means.
So i tested it out today before posting. Made a couple of tweaks and got it to shift to 20% AI. I did it by changing the paragraph structure to several stand out single sentences. Same words different structure.
Im thinking of copying 3 articles into 1 post. 1 of my several identified as 100% human, the 1 identified as. 100% AI and the one that is 50/50 and let people come to their own conclusion. But dont want a pile on where people claim im lying about the AI written one and give some reason why its not me